I wrote my last blog mainly about what I expected of the author’s in the books we will read
throughout the rest of the semester. There were a few themes I mentioned. Mainly, the themes the
books encompass, and how the authors continue to mess with the reader. One of the main themes of
Mumbo Jumbo was how the Wallflower Order and the Atonists aimed to hold back and get rid of Jes
Grew. In essence, this was a white versus black social battle. The Atonists fight to hold down African
American culture and keep it out of culture. The very end of the book reminds me a lot of
American culture and keep it out of culture. The very end of the book reminds me a lot of
Ragtime, and makes me think that this is a common theme of history as fiction novels. The novel
ends with the narrative, “Time is pendulum, Not a river. More akin to what goes around comes
around.” (218). This immediately reminded me of how we talked about how the Black Panthers were
transported through time and dropped into the Ragtime narrative with Coalhouse Walker’s crew. The
social issues presented in each book’s narrative directly related to the time period the novel was
published. Both of these novels were published not too long after the civil rights era, so it makes
sense to have these socially relevant topics. I don’t know if this is a part of history as fiction, but
judging what I already know about Slaughterhouse Five, I think it might be. By “this,” I mean using
history in fiction to depict social criticisms of both the time period of the book but also the time
period it was published. In short, Ragtime shows that Black Panther-esque characters and fighting
for civil rights can be applied to both the 1910s and the 1960s. The racism of Conklin is still relevant
to people of the 1970s who just had to fight against racism for civil rights in the 1960s. For Mumbo
Jumbo, I notice that the theme is about racism in a similar way. Abdul is murdered in a racist fashion
by Vampton. Vampton spends much of the novel working to using black people as an object to
destroy black culture. I think that as our novels are published in different times the social issues they
tackle will be going with the time accordingly. I already know some about Slaughterhouse Five, so I
think you guys should be looking out for the social issue presented in the novel. There are lots of
parallels between the two novels we have read so far, both dealing with issues of race. As far as the
author messing with us, we talked about how the text is supposed to be in kind of vernacular, but
what I think was the important part of how he messed with us was how he ordered the story. PaPa
LaBas knew the outcome of the story with many pages to go, and we only learned how it would turn
out toward the very end. So the detective aspect of the story is a little different. I’m curious about
how the authors will play with us for the rest of the class.
I think it's interesting how these authors are able to "manipulate" history and historical figures to enhance the implications of these novels. I saw this especially with the weaving of people like Houdini in Ragtime, and also with the Egypt narrative in Mumbo Jumbo. With this historical narrative of Moses that Labas shares with us, we are able to see Jes Grew and Atonism as a part of the past, as the rest of the book we see it in the 1920s and as a reflection of the 1960s, and we talked yesterday about how both Jes Grew and Atonism persist today - Reed proves that the fight between black and white power has been and still is an issue.
ReplyDeleteI certainly think this will definitely be something to look at in our next book. I feel like the fact that it takes someone from our time and places them in the past is a way to also talk about what still are problems in the current day. I certainly think that this will continue to happen in the rest of the class.
ReplyDelete